Closes the Group L "end-to-end provisioning test on Hetzner test project"
ticket. Per the ticket's exact wording: scaffolding + harness + CI
workflow, gated on HETZNER_TEST_TOKEN, NEVER mocked.
Lifecycle when HETZNER_TEST_TOKEN is set:
1. Generate unique sovereign FQDN (e2e-<run-id>.openova.io)
2. Stage canonical infra/hetzner/ OpenTofu module into temp dir
3. Render tofu.auto.tfvars.json with test inputs (BYO domain mode so
Dynadot isn't touched; region runtime-configurable; SSH key minted
by CI per-run)
4. tofu init && tofu apply -auto-approve (30m timeout)
5. Assert outputs: control_plane_ip + load_balancer_ip are valid IPv4
6. Assert TCP/22 reachable on control plane (5m await)
7. Assert TCP/443 reachable on LB after Cilium + Flux land (15m await,
soft-failure since the Catalyst control plane install is the long
tail and partial-bootstrap is acceptable proof of OpenTofu + Flux)
8. tofu destroy -auto-approve (always — t.Cleanup, runs even on fail)
9. Verify state list is empty after destroy (no leaked resources)
When HETZNER_TEST_TOKEN is absent, the test SKIPS — does not mock, does
not fall through to a stub. Per docs/INVIOLABLE-PRINCIPLES.md #2,
mocking the cloud would tell us nothing about whether the OpenTofu module,
hcloud provider, cloud-init scripts, or k3s actually work. A second test
(TestHarness_NoHetznerCredsSkips) explicitly verifies the skip semantics
so future refactors don't accidentally land mocking.
CI workflow (.github/workflows/test-hetzner-e2e.yaml):
- Triggers on workflow_dispatch (operator initiates real run) or PR
labeled `test/hetzner-e2e` — NOT on every push (each run costs real
Hetzner minutes ~EUR 0.005/run).
- Generates a per-run throwaway SSH ed25519 keypair so no secret
long-term key lands in any logs.
- Installs OpenTofu via opentofu/setup-opentofu@v1.
- Reads HETZNER_TEST_TOKEN + HETZNER_TEST_PROJECT_ID from repo secrets;
operator populates them out-of-band (per the ticket: "operator will
populate later").
- 55m job timeout, plus the test itself uses contexts of 30m apply
+ 20m destroy.
Files:
- tests/e2e/hetzner-provisioning/main_test.go (the harness)
- tests/e2e/hetzner-provisioning/go.mod (separate module, stdlib-only)
- .github/workflows/test-hetzner-e2e.yaml (gated CI)
Refs #141
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .claude | ||
| .github | ||
| core | ||
| docs | ||
| infra/hetzner | ||
| platform | ||
| products | ||
| tests/e2e | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| README.md | ||
OpenOva Catalyst
A self-sufficient Kubernetes-native platform. Published as signed OCI Blueprints. Deployable as your own Sovereign.
Catalyst is the open-source platform built by OpenOva. It turns any Kubernetes cluster into a Sovereign: a self-contained control plane that hosts Organizations, Environments, and Applications via GitOps + Crossplane, with a unified UI/Git/API for users.
Documentation
| Document | What it covers |
|---|---|
docs/GLOSSARY.md |
Canonical terminology — read first |
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md |
Catalyst architecture overview |
docs/IMPLEMENTATION-STATUS.md |
What's built today vs what's design-only — read second |
docs/NAMING-CONVENTION.md |
Naming patterns for every resource type |
docs/PERSONAS-AND-JOURNEYS.md |
Personas × journeys matrix; surfaces |
docs/SECURITY.md |
Identity (SPIFFE + Keycloak), secrets (OpenBao + ESO), rotation, multi-region semantics |
docs/SOVEREIGN-PROVISIONING.md |
How to bring a Sovereign online |
docs/BLUEPRINT-AUTHORING.md |
Writing Blueprints (incl. Crossplane Compositions) |
docs/PLATFORM-TECH-STACK.md |
Every component's role in Catalyst |
docs/SRE.md |
Operating a Sovereign |
docs/BUSINESS-STRATEGY.md |
Product strategy and GTM |
docs/TECHNOLOGY-FORECAST-2027-2030.md |
Component forecast 2027–2030 |
docs/VALIDATION-LOG.md |
Trail of doc-integrity validation passes (audit log) |
Heads-up before reading further: the architecture docs in this repo describe Catalyst's target state. Significant portions are not yet implemented — see
docs/IMPLEMENTATION-STATUS.mdfor what exists today vs what is design.
The model in 60 seconds
OpenOva (the company) publishes Catalyst (the platform).
A deployed Catalyst is called a Sovereign.
A Sovereign has:
- Organizations (multi-tenancy unit)
- Environments (org-scoped, env-typed: prod/stg/uat/dev/poc)
- Applications (installed Blueprints)
- Blueprints (the App Store catalog — public + Org-private)
Users install Applications from Blueprints into Environments.
Blueprints can depend on Blueprints (arbitrary depth).
Each Environment is one Gitea repo + one or more vclusters.
Every state change is a Git commit.
Every UI surface reads from a single CQRS projection.
Same code runs in every Sovereign:
- openova (run by us; SaaS Organizations)
- omantel (run by Omantel; SME Organizations across Oman)
- bankdhofar (run by the bank; internal Organizations)
- your-company (run by you, on infrastructure you choose)
See docs/GLOSSARY.md for every term, docs/ARCHITECTURE.md for the full picture.
What's in this repo
openova/
├── core/ # Catalyst control-plane application (Go) — design-stage; mostly placeholders today
├── platform/ # Component Blueprint folders (one folder per upstream OSS project)
├── products/ # Composite Blueprint folders OpenOva publishes
│ ├── catalyst/ # The Catalyst control plane itself, target umbrella Blueprint
│ ├── cortex/ # AI Hub (LLM serving, RAG, AI safety)
│ ├── axon/ # SaaS LLM Gateway (default upstream for Cortex)
│ ├── fingate/ # Open Banking (PSD2/FAPI sandbox)
│ ├── fabric/ # Data & Integration (event-driven + lakehouse)
│ └── relay/ # Communication (email, video, chat, WebRTC)
│ # (specter and exodus are deliverable services, not Blueprints in this layout)
└── docs/ # Platform documentation
Each folder under platform/ and products/ is the source of one Blueprint, published from CI as a signed OCI artifact at ghcr.io/openova-io/bp-<name>:<semver> (the bp- prefix is added to the OCI artifact name; folder names stay short). Per-folder isolation is provided at the OCI artifact layer, not the Git repo layer — this is a monorepo with per-Blueprint fan-out, not a meta-repo of separate Git repositories. See docs/BLUEPRINT-AUTHORING.md §2 for the folder layout contract.
Today, every folder under
platform/andproducts/(exceptproducts/axon/) contains only aREADME.md. The Blueprint manifests, charts, Compositions, and CI fan-out are all design-stage — seedocs/IMPLEMENTATION-STATUS.md.
Stack at a glance
| Layer | Technology |
|---|---|
| Container runtime | k3s (k8s-conformant), containerd |
| CNI / Service Mesh | Cilium (eBPF mTLS, L7 policies, Gateway API) |
| GitOps | Flux (per-vcluster, lightweight) |
| Git | Gitea (per-Sovereign, hosts Blueprint mirror + per-Environment repos) |
| IaC for non-K8s | Crossplane (the only IaC; not user-facing) |
| Bootstrap IaC | OpenTofu (one-shot, archived after Phase 0) |
| Multi-tenancy | vcluster (one per Organization per host cluster) |
| Identity (workloads) | SPIFFE/SPIRE (5-min rotating SVIDs, mTLS everywhere) |
| Identity (users) | Keycloak (per-Org for SME, per-Sovereign for corporate) |
| Secrets | OpenBao (Apache 2.0; independent Raft per region, no stretched cluster) + External Secrets Operator |
| Event spine | NATS JetStream (Apache 2.0; pub/sub + KV; per-Org accounts) |
| TLS | cert-manager + Let's Encrypt or corporate CA |
| Policy | Kyverno |
| Supply chain | cosign (Sigstore), Syft + Grype SBOM, Trivy scans |
| Runtime security | Falco (eBPF) |
| Observability | OpenTelemetry → Grafana stack (Alloy + Loki + Mimir + Tempo) |
| WAF | Coraza (OWASP CRS) |
| GSLB | k8gb (authoritative DNS) |
| Backup | Velero (to SeaweedFS, which routes the cold tier to cloud archival S3) |
| Container registry | Harbor |
For the full component list and trends see docs/PLATFORM-TECH-STACK.md and docs/TECHNOLOGY-FORECAST-2027-2030.md.
Cloud providers
| Provider | Status |
|---|---|
| Hetzner Cloud | Available (most-tested path) |
| AWS / GCP / Azure | Crossplane providers available; full path coming |
| Oracle Cloud (OCI) | Crossplane provider available; full path coming |
| Huawei Cloud | Crossplane provider available; full path coming |
All providers reach Catalyst via the same Crossplane abstraction; Sovereign provisioning details per provider are in docs/SOVEREIGN-PROVISIONING.md.
Getting started
Try it (managed)
Visit marketplace.openova.io to install Applications on the openova Sovereign without any infrastructure setup. SaaS journey for SMEs and evaluations.
Run your own Sovereign
1. Provision via catalyst-provisioner.openova.io (managed bootstrap), OR
2. Self-host bp-catalyst-provisioner in your own infrastructure (air-gap path).
Then follow the procedure in docs/SOVEREIGN-PROVISIONING.md.
Build a Blueprint
See docs/BLUEPRINT-AUTHORING.md. A Blueprint is a folder under platform/<name>/ (or products/<name>/) in this monorepo containing blueprint.yaml + manifests (Helm chart or Kustomize base) + (optional) Crossplane Compositions. CI signs each folder's contents and publishes to OCI as ghcr.io/openova-io/bp-<name>:<semver>. Catalyst's blueprint-controller picks it up automatically. Org-private Blueprints follow the same shape inside per-Sovereign Gitea repos.
License
All Blueprints and the Catalyst control plane are open source. Each component carries its own upstream license (typically Apache 2.0, MPL 2.0, or BSD-3); see each component's LICENSE file.
OpenOva charges for support, managed operations, and expert services — never for access to code. See docs/BUSINESS-STRATEGY.md §10.
Contributing
PRs welcome. The contribution path for Blueprints (including Crossplane Compositions) is documented in docs/BLUEPRINT-AUTHORING.md §13. Issues and discussions on GitHub.
Cloud-native is the foundation. Catalyst is how you operate it.