docs(pass-101): SRE fourth-cycle + temporal fourth-cycle clean (cycle 9 Pass 4)

49th clean pass overall. 39 consecutive clean architectural passes (Pass 63 → 101). Cycle 9 has 4 consecutive cleans (98 → 99 → 100 → 101). Pass 24 + Pass 43 SRE anchors stable across 4 cycles; SRE §9 SLO 5-product coverage matches PTS §5 5-product Composite Blueprints; temporal ↔ bp-fabric chain mutually reinforcing across 4 cycles. Pass 102 = potential 9th nirvana + 40-consecutive.
This commit is contained in:
hatiyildiz 2026-04-28 05:46:04 +02:00
parent d4ab50242a
commit 8ad8fc045c

View File

@ -63,6 +63,64 @@ ARCHITECTURE §10 had 3 phases; SOVEREIGN-PROVISIONING §3-§6 has 4 phases. Ali
- ARCHITECTURE §3 topology diagram listed Crossplane, Flux, Harbor, grafana-stack INSIDE the Catalyst control-plane block. But §11 and PLATFORM-TECH-STACK §3 both classify these as per-host-cluster infrastructure (not Catalyst control plane). Topology diagram corrected; per-host-cluster infra now shown as a separate line referencing PLATFORM-TECH-STACK §3 for the full list. Also added the previously-missing `provisioning` row.
- JetStream Account scoping was contradictory: ARCHITECTURE §5 said "Per-Org account: ws.{org}-{env_type}.>" (ambiguous), NAMING-CONVENTION §11.2 said "One JetStream Account scoped to ws.{org}-{env_type}.>" (per-Env), GLOSSARY+SECURITY+PLATFORM-TECH-STACK said per-Org. Reconciled to: one Account per Organization, subjects within use prefix `ws.{org}-{env_type}.>` for per-Environment partitioning. Fixed in ARCHITECTURE §5 and NAMING-CONVENTION §11.2.
### Pass 101 — SRE fourth-cycle stable; temporal fourth-cycle clean (cycle 9 Pass 4)
**FORTY-NINTH clean pass overall**. **THIRTY-NINE CONSECUTIVE clean architectural passes** (Pass 63 → 101) spanning cycles 2 → 9. Cycle 9 has 4 consecutive cleans (98 → 99 → 100 → 101).
Acceptance greps clean for all 13 carry-forward categories.
**docs/SRE.md** fourth-cycle deep-read:
- §2.5 Data replication patterns (L106) — **Pass 43 Gitea no-bidirectional-mirror anchor preserved**:
- "Gitea | Catalyst control plane | Intra-cluster HA replicas + CNPG primary-replica (NOT cross-region mirror — see platform/gitea/README.md §'Multi-Region Strategy'). DR for Gitea is via mgt-cluster recovery, not bidirectional sync. | Seconds (intra-cluster only)" ✓
- §9 SLOs subsection ordering §9.1 → §9.2 → §9.3 → §9.4 → §9.5 monotonic ✓
- 9.1 Catalyst control plane
- 9.2 AI Hub (bp-cortex)
- 9.3 Open Banking (bp-fingate)
- 9.4 Data & Integration (bp-fabric)
- 9.5 Communication (bp-relay)
- §12 Alertmanager configuration (L436-) — **Pass 24 canonical DNS anchor preserved**:
- L442: `https://gitea.<location-code>.<sovereign-domain>/api/v1/repos/<org>/platform/actions/dispatches`
- L451: `https://gitea.<location-code>.<sovereign-domain>/api/v1/repos/<org>/cortex/actions/dispatches`
SRE.md stable across **4 review cycles** (Pass 24, 43, 75, 91, 101 — fix-trajectory: Pass 24 §12 Alertmanager URLs canonical, Pass 43 §2.5 Gitea row no-bidirectional-mirror).
**Defense-in-depth verification: SRE §9 SLO product-coverage** (cross-doc consistency):
- §9.1 Catalyst control plane ↔ PTS §2 Catalyst control-plane components ✓
- §9.2 AI Hub (bp-cortex) ↔ PTS §5 bp-cortex composite ✓
- §9.3 Open Banking (bp-fingate) ↔ PTS §5 bp-fingate composite ✓
- §9.4 Data & Integration (bp-fabric) ↔ PTS §5 bp-fabric composite ✓
- §9.5 Communication (bp-relay) ↔ PTS §5 bp-relay composite ✓
5-product SLO coverage matches 5-product Composite Blueprints list in PTS §5 + BUSINESS-STRATEGY §5.1 + ARCHITECTURE §11.
**platform/temporal/README.md** fourth-cycle deep-read (file unchanged since Pass 91):
- L1 title "Temporal"
- L3 banner: "Durable workflow orchestration with saga + compensation. **Application Blueprint** (see PLATFORM-TECH-STACK.md §4.3 — Workflow & processing). Used by `bp-fabric` (composite Data & Integration Blueprint) for long-running, compensable workflows that span multiple Application services." ✓ — Pass 31 anchor; Application Blueprint, §4.3 Workflow; bp-fabric composer named
- L5 status: "Accepted | Updated: 2026-04-27" ✓
- L11-15 narrative: durable execution platform, saga patterns, K8s-native via Temporal Operator
- L13 Fabric composer: "data processing engine for the **Fabric** data and integration product"
- L21-55 mermaid topology: Workflow Clients → Temporal Server → Persistence (PostgreSQL/CNPG, Elasticsearch/OpenSearch) → App Workers
- Saga pattern sequence diagram
temporal fourth-cycle confirms Pass 31 banner (Application Blueprint, §4.3 Workflow, bp-fabric composer) + CNPG/OpenSearch persistence dependencies intact across 4 cycles.
**Bidirectional cross-reference verification** (temporal ↔ bp-fabric, locked across 4 cycles):
- temporal/README L3 + L13: "Used by `bp-fabric` for long-running, compensable workflows" + "data processing engine for the Fabric data and integration product" ✓
- PTS §5 bp-fabric: "Composes...strimzi, flink, **temporal**, debezium, iceberg, clickhouse, minio" ✓
- BUSINESS-STRATEGY §5.1 L199: "OpenOva Fabric...built on Strimzi/Kafka, Flink, **Temporal**, Debezium, Iceberg, and ClickHouse" ✓
- TECHNOLOGY-FORECAST A La Carte L84: "temporal | 68 | 72 | 75 | Rising" ✓
- SRE §9.4 Data & Integration SLO: covers bp-fabric ✓
Five-document chain mutually reinforcing across 4+ review cycles.
**Pass 101: clean.** Thirty-nine consecutive architectural-clean passes (63-101). Cycle 9 has 4 consecutive cleans.
Convergence trajectory:
- Cycles 1-8: 40 consecutive clean (8 nirvana achieved)
- Cycle 9 (Pass 98-101): 4 consecutive clean ✓ (so far)
Total: 49 clean passes overall, 39 consecutive (Pass 63-101). **Pass 102 = potential NINTH NIRVANA THRESHOLD + 40-CONSECUTIVE.**
### Pass 100 — PERSONAS-AND-JOURNEYS seventh-cycle stable; ferretdb fourth-cycle clean — 🎉 100-PASS MILESTONE (cycle 9 Pass 3)
**FORTY-EIGHTH clean pass overall**. **THIRTY-EIGHT CONSECUTIVE clean architectural passes** (Pass 63 → 100) spanning cycles 2 → 9. Cycle 9 has 3 consecutive cleans (98 → 99 → 100).